Saturday, August 19, 2006

Primitivism 2. (in relation and consequence to Marxism)

Something that has been on my mind recently is the relation between historical materialism and Primitivism, especially since this is such a big part of the libertarian left in the United States. I also find myself often wondering if there is a trade-off between material well being and individual autonomy and spirituality, and I would have to say that this is an inevitable result of proletarianisation, and the development of the modern nation state and the myths used to justify it.

Put this way, a proletarian revolution is almost impossible in the three most developed nations (being the UK, or even just England, the US and a united Germany) or the nations that have been proletarianised the longest (i.e. where the process began contemporary to Messrs Bakunin and Marx)

A "workers revolution" would be impossible in other nations without the liquidation of the state. The state is itself a capitalist entity and works on the same laws. A "workers state" (surely a contradiction in terms anyway) would always be forced to compete with the "big three", so a proletarian revolution in roughly Marxist terms requires the total liquidation of the national and state institutions of Germany, the US and the UK.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home