LAST POST: An Addendum

1.I suppose I would criticise "Democracy" on Individualist
Grounds and Authoritarian Regimes on Liberal grounds.

2.Or Authoritarianism on Liberal grounds and Liberalism
on Individualist grounds.

3.Or Democratic States/Authoritarian States I could go on

4.Bookchin's "Lumpen Fascists": just skimmed thru 1st 2
chapters can't find the reference.

Got a link tho, might be in ch. 7 or 8?

http://libcom.org/library/socanlifean2

5."Anarchism:An Artificial Chasm" is what I ought to
write!!!

Frankly there is no difference between left and right
in politics in general and anarchism in particular:
only,one side calls the other Nazis, one side calls the
other Hippies, its PATHETIC

I think all strands of Anarchism have their idosyncracies
but they all provide arguments that are difficult to avoid.

6.Isn't it basically all this way: collective organising
=authoritarian while individual non-organising=
ineffective?

When in fact BOTH methods are valid, but both can be seen
as aggressive or anti-social.