Saddam, but not Negroponte, Albright, Clinton, Bush Snr and jnr,
Rumsfeld, Mugabe etc
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/12/358982.html
-Indymedia article basically sums up the whos, whys and wherefores.
May his soul not rest in peace, but saying that I am saddened
that he was executed, for at least two reasons directly and
many others indirectly due to the rank hypocrises of our
"peace loving" leaders.
1.The state has no more moral right than any individual,
to kill anyone for any reason.
2.Saddam commited worse crimes and should
have gone to trial for those as well. 660 Palestinians
were killed this year, Israel would say that was self-defence.
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/12/358964.html
Also, how many people can you justify killing in self-defence?
Saddam would (probably) argue that the 100-odd
executions were a form of self-defence (the argument
is used in a similar fashion to defend the death penalty
as a deterrence). Similarly, what if the troops occupying
Iraq and Afganistan were "forced" to kill, say, 400K insurgents?
I think Jack Straw et al are hypocrites for gloating over
Saddam's execution. They have as much moral authority
as I would if, for example, I dug up Ronald "Railgun"
Reagan's corpse and removed his rotting heart from
his body!Or, for example, stealing the body for ransom
of a relative of a ginea pig farm.
Of course, maybe Jack Straw's being brutally honest.
Maybe he's right about the veil, for example?
But what would people think if one day he said
"I've got a new joke: What does 50 Cent
listen to music on? His PIMP3 player."
Being brutally honest again, all those men who go to
see films with Keira Knightley (for example) in them
"must" be peadophiles as she's got the body
of someone who's still of the age where,
to put it politely
naked from the waist up and from behind, you can't
specify their gender!
These opinions really should be kept for private
discussion. Politicians, and state priests in general
have a habit of dictating morality. People listen to
them because they are in a position of authority.
Rumsfeld, Mugabe etc
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/12/358982.html
-Indymedia article basically sums up the whos, whys and wherefores.
May his soul not rest in peace, but saying that I am saddened
that he was executed, for at least two reasons directly and
many others indirectly due to the rank hypocrises of our
"peace loving" leaders.
1.The state has no more moral right than any individual,
to kill anyone for any reason.
2.Saddam commited worse crimes and should
have gone to trial for those as well. 660 Palestinians
were killed this year, Israel would say that was self-defence.
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/12/358964.html
Also, how many people can you justify killing in self-defence?
Saddam would (probably) argue that the 100-odd
executions were a form of self-defence (the argument
is used in a similar fashion to defend the death penalty
as a deterrence). Similarly, what if the troops occupying
Iraq and Afganistan were "forced" to kill, say, 400K insurgents?
I think Jack Straw et al are hypocrites for gloating over
Saddam's execution. They have as much moral authority
as I would if, for example, I dug up Ronald "Railgun"
Reagan's corpse and removed his rotting heart from
his body!Or, for example, stealing the body for ransom
of a relative of a ginea pig farm.
Of course, maybe Jack Straw's being brutally honest.
Maybe he's right about the veil, for example?
But what would people think if one day he said
"I've got a new joke: What does 50 Cent
listen to music on? His PIMP3 player."
Being brutally honest again, all those men who go to
see films with Keira Knightley (for example) in them
"must" be peadophiles as she's got the body
of someone who's still of the age where,
to put it politely
naked from the waist up and from behind, you can't
specify their gender!
These opinions really should be kept for private
discussion. Politicians, and state priests in general
have a habit of dictating morality. People listen to
them because they are in a position of authority.
<< Home