The Dehumanisation of the Underclass

This isn't meant to be a stereotypical view of w/c Brits, it is a critique
of the way elements in and influencing the Labour Party have used the
two issues to divide and alienate the working class.


If we take the fact that 800,000 people voted BNP in the 2004 European
election and that there are 300,000 heroin addicts in the UK, imagine
what would happen if a political movement as strong as these numbers
were to combine?

and I'm not talking about STWC, although it may have ruffled some feathers
in the more reactionary elements of the elite


Its often stated that increased BNP votes is a reflection of increased Labour
failure. But what if 'the people at the top' wanted this to happen?
It's similar to heroin use, which is why
I included it: the exact situation doesn't matter, what matters is that people
are fed up enough and want change enough to have the power collectively
to change society but are so alienated that they are diverted with anti-social
tendencies, and more importantly this is deliberately accelerated.


Drug prohibition doesn't work and imprisoning addicts (and the mentally ill,
children etc) certainly doesn't work. Prohibition in fact seems to increase
the number of addicts, most of whom are trying to deal with childhood trauma.


A further (well, worse than) patronising attitude to working class people
was revealed in a short reading of "Wasting Police Time". The chapter
on "the underclass" seemed to imply that you can tell if someone is "scum"
if they watch "Trishia". The numbers of "scum" apparently amount to two
million, presumably revealed by the viewing figures
of "Trishia". Apparently a very small number of students etc watch "Trishia"
for ironic reasons, the majority are still scum, presumably because they
have small children to look after.


Shows up the "high reasoning abilities" of British Pigs!


He then went on to blame women for being victims of domestic violence,
because "when you come round they've got bruises on their knuckles".
Aren't people allowed to defend themselves? And not to sound patronising
myself, but couples can and do have some quite vicious arguments.