I'm not sure it actually IS possible to be a consistent
'reactionary' or a consistent 'libertarian' because people
on these two 'opposite' sides end up making the same argument,
simply:

'They' or 'We' are aware of the consequences

As soon as 'reactionaries' and 'libertarians' use this argument
they become neither because there is then no discernable
difference between them.

A reactionary cannot stay a reactionary for long before they
end up advocating legalising blackmail and hard drugs-
because if 'they' are 'aware of the consequences' then 'we
are aware of the consequences'

Like I said, if all drugs, guns and porn are all legal it
is because 'we' are all 'adults' and can make up our own
minds (according to libertarians).

Because we are 'aware of the consequences'.

Just as all killers (even children or individuals
with personality disorders) are alwyas alleged to be
'aware' of the consequences and 'know' the difference
between right and wrong (according to reactionaries,
who, I might add, would balk at legalising drugs or
lowering the age of consent).